‘Extreme hostility’ between lawyer-judge mars refugee hearing

A refugee claimant was handed a reprieve on his removal from Canada because of an angry blow-up between his lawyer and the immigration judge, a feud betraying such animosity the Federal Court ruled the bewildered client could not have expected an unbiased hearing.

The decision raises the spectre of the “automatic disqualification” of judges to hear immigration cases, where the small pool of immigration lawyers repeatedly runs up against an even smaller pool of immigration and refugee board adjudicators.

The Haitian man’s bid for asylum in Canada got off to a bad start when his Montreal lawyer, Chantal Ianniciello, realized she was appearing before Immigration and Refugee Board adjudicator Youssoupha Diop.

Read the rest of this National Post article

Posted in In the Media |

Please note: There is no solicitor-client privilege attached to this communication.  Sending an e-mail to Levine Associates will not make us your lawyers.  You will not be considered a client of the firm until we have agreed to act for you in accordance with our usual policies for accepting clients.  Unless you are a current client of Levine Associates, please do not include any confidential information in your e-mail, because no information you send us can be held in confidence, and no information we provide to you can be treated by you as legal advice, unless and until we have agreed to act for you.  There is no solicitor-client privilege attached to this communication.