Mao Qin Wang v. Canada

Application for judicial review.

Wang feared that if returned he would be unable to practice his Roman Catholic religion freely.  The panel found Wang was never a genuine practicing Roman Catholic, and his level of religious knowledge was below what would be expected for three years of practice.

Wang correctly answered questions related to his religion and produced  baptismal and confirmation certificates.   The Board gave little weight to his evidence.

HELD: Application allowed.   The Board erred in determining that Wang was not a genuine Roman Catholic by holding him to an unreasonably high standard of religious knowledge.  The Board erred by determining Wang’s knowledge by way of  a “trivia” test.   The Board erred by expecting Wang’s answers about his religion to be at the same level of knowledge at the Boards.

Counsel of Record: Shelley Levine

Read the complete judgement


Posted in Case Law |

Please note: There is no solicitor-client privilege attached to this communication.  Sending an e-mail to Levine Associates will not make us your lawyers.  You will not be considered a client of the firm until we have agreed to act for you in accordance with our usual policies for accepting clients.  Unless you are a current client of Levine Associates, please do not include any confidential information in your e-mail, because no information you send us can be held in confidence, and no information we provide to you can be treated by you as legal advice, unless and until we have agreed to act for you.  There is no solicitor-client privilege attached to this communication.