Y.J.C. v. M.C.I., [2010] F.C.J. No. 293

Panel determined the applicant was not a Convention Refugee because she could return to China and practise her religion a state church without any doctrinal constraint on the practice as a genuine Christian.

Application allowed.  Panel erred by concluding the applicant could attend the state sanctioned church when the claimant stated that she rejected that church. Panel’s should not be dictating where claimants can attend their religion. Further, panel failed to determine whether claimant would be free to practise the religion of her choosing without fear of persecution.

Counsel for Applicant: Shelley Levine

Posted in Case Law |

Please note: There is no solicitor-client privilege attached to this communication.  Sending an e-mail to Levine Associates will not make us your lawyers.  You will not be considered a client of the firm until we have agreed to act for you in accordance with our usual policies for accepting clients.  Unless you are a current client of Levine Associates, please do not include any confidential information in your e-mail, because no information you send us can be held in confidence, and no information we provide to you can be treated by you as legal advice, unless and until we have agreed to act for you.  There is no solicitor-client privilege attached to this communication.